Accountability Dashboard
Listening, learning, and reporting back to our community.
Accountability Dashboard
This accountability dashboard is a voluntary transparency tool that provides quarterly updates on our engagement with the community. Biannual updates related to financial and contracting metrics can be found under the Reporting tab.
Listening
Public Meetings Held
25
January - March 2023
Meetings held include advisory committee meetings.
Community Presentations
19
January – March 2023
Community presentations are presentations given to various community groups, neighborhoods, and municipalities at their request.
Comments Received
100
January - March 2023
Newsletter Subscribers
6,958
Subscribers to date
Social Media Engagements
4,909
January – March 2023
Media Stories
103
January - March 2023
Media stories generated about the IBR program between January and March.
Advisory Group Meeting Engagement
January-March 2023
Meeting views are those who viewed the meeting from YouTube either during the presentation or at a later time/date. These numbers are reflective of the advisory group meetings from January - March 2023.
Group | Meeting Views |
---|---|
Executive Steering Group | 115 |
Equity Advisory Group | 170 |
Community Advisory Group | 514 |
Accessibility
January - March 2023
Caption Services | Total |
---|---|
Meetings with captions | 4 |
Meetings with ASL | 4 |
Documents Remediated | 15 |
The program provided ASL interpretations and closed captioning for public meetings and events hosted by the program.
Documents and meeting presentations are remediated and made ADA compliant before posting to our website.
Videos Produced
5
January – March 2023
Content was created to honor Black History Month, highlight overall needs during the bridge's not-so-Happy Birthday, introductions of Assistant Program Administrators Frank Green and Ray Mabey, and a summary of 2022.
YouTube Lifetime Views
40,469
Since program launch
Lifetime YouTube views are all of the views you have gained on your channel since you started uploading videos.
Website Visitors
10,449
January – March 2023
An anonymous website metric which tracks users visiting a website. This metric includes new users and returning visitors.
Learning
Environmental Compliance
The IBR program is responsible for developing a solution that addresses the program’s purpose and need and communities’ vision and values, in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to assess and consider the environmental effects of proposed actions and inform the public prior to making decisions.
Environmental compliance efforts identify the environmental impacts and search for solutions that avoid impacts, minimize impacts if avoidance is not possible, or mitigate adverse impacts where feasible. The IBR program must obtain multiple permits and approvals related to land use and the environment before construction begins. Visit our Environmental Compliance page for more information.
Some compliance efforts that the IBR program must address include:
- Environment: Air quality, water quality, noise, vibrations, ecosystems and climate
- Historic and Cultural Resources: Historic and protected areas, archeological resources, and Tribal consultation
- People and Communities: Providing fair treatment to and meaningful involvement from all people and assuring that federal actions do not disproportionately impact minority and low-income populations.
- Marine Navigation: The Columbia River supports a variety of marine vessels including barges, recreational boats and government vessels. The program will require a bridge permit from the U.S. Coast Guard. Modification of the navigation channel and levees requires approval from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Cost Estimate and Financial Plan
The IBR program cost estimate reflects the components being analyzed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The cost estimate accounts for current market conditions, along with potential risks and cost saving opportunities, and includes costs associated with constructing the replacement bridge and other program components in the 2025 – 2035 timeframe. The estimated cost for the program is $5 to $7.5 billion, with a likely estimated cost of $6 billion. Revenue from a diverse range of sources is required, including federal funds, tolling, and state funds from both Oregon and Washington. Tolls will be used to help pay for construction, operations and maintenance of the facility, and to help improve travel reliability within the program corridor. The Financial Plan identifies potential funding sources and financing mechanisms, including federal funds, tolling, and state contributions. For more information, visit our Cost, Funding & Economic Benefits page.
Community Advisory Group Highlights
- In January, Community Advisory Group members received updates from co-chairs Lynn Valenter and Ed Washington and from Program Administrator Greg Johnson. Members were also given an overview of the cost estimate from program leadership, discussed workforce needs and trends, and received an update from the Community Engagement team.
- In February, members learned about the work being done for Cultural and Historic Resources in compliance with Section 106 of the National Environmental Protection Act, and heard from the Community Engagement team about their ongoing efforts. Discussion and feedback was also provided around how best to get the advisory group members and their communities involved and provide input.
- In March, CAG members received a program update from Program Administrator Greg Johnson. The Urban Design team provided an overview of the urban design process and how community priorities could be addressed through the process. The Community Engagement team provided an update of their activities and the group discussed their ideas and input for future engagement.
Equity Advisory Group Highlights
- In January, Equity Advisory Group members received a program update from Program Administrator Greg Johnson and were informed about the IBR cost estimate, including scope, funding, and economic impacts. The group also shared their ideas and questions around job opportunities and other investment impacts. The group also discussed and further refined the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure success for the program's equity framework.
- In March, Equity Advisory Group members received a program update from Program Administrator Greg Johnson. The Urban Design team provided an overview of the urban design process and how equity and climate priorities could be addressed through the process. The Community Engagement team provided an update of their activities and sought feedback from members on recommendations for events IBR should consider attending this spring and summer, equity-priority communities and community-based organizations that IBR should consider partnering with, and which equity-priority media outlets IBR should reach out to.
Roundtable Event: Women Paving the Way
To celebrate Women's History Month, the IBR program hosted a virtual roundtable in March with a six-woman panel of regional leaders to highlight the role of women in transportation and infrastructure. The group shared experiences navigating what is traditionally a male-dominated field, and shed light on career challenges, triumphs, and best practices for future women leaders.
"I’m thinking so much on this program about our users of this infrastructure that we’re trying to build, and just being more sensitive to the less dominant parts of our society who need to get around in our communities too. From the cyclists, to the parents, to the working people hauling back and forth…" -Mara Krinke, Climate Office, IBR Program
What we've heard and how we're responding
We've heard that many community members want to receive frequent updates and program information.
We've heard that individuals and groups are interested in getting involved or volunteering with the program.
The program has received ongoing comments and questions around tolling, program benefits, and costs.
Bridge Stories
What’s your story?
We want to hear your experience using the bridge, what the bridge means to you and the benefits a replacement bridge could provide.
Send your story to info@interstatebridge.org. | View more bridge stories.
Reporting
Updated through December 2022. Contracting and expenditure data takes longer to receive and compile and may not be available until months after the reported timeframe. The program will continue to share accountability reports and develop additional reporting metrics.
The most recent updated finance reports provide information about the economic impact analysis, finance planning and risk assessment efforts completed for components included in the Modified Locally Preferred Alternative which were approved for further analysis in July 2022. Cost estimates and financial plans will continue to be updated as the program is refined.
Current reports are listed to the right. For more information, visit our library.
Financial Reports
Economic Impact of IBR Program Capital Investment (April 2023)
IBR Financial Plan (April 2023)
Quantitative Risk Assessment Summary (April 2023)
Quantitative Risk Assessment Report (April 2023)
Bi-state and Legislative Reports
2022 Legislative Progress Report (December)
2022 Legislative Progress Report (June)
Community Engagement Reports
2021 Fall Community Engagement Report
2021 Spring Community Engagement Report
Program Timeline
The program is utilizing past work as appropriate to maximize past investment and support efficient decision-making, while also taking into account changes that have occurred since the previous planning process to identify a solution that meets current and future community needs and priorities. The IBR program will work with the community, as well as local, state, federal and tribal partners to complete the following work in the coming years:
- Complete the environmental review process
- Obtain state and federal permits
- Finalize program design
- Develop a finance plan
- Secure adequate funding
- Complete right-of-way acquisition
- Advertise for construction
The program is working with partners to identify what has changed and what design options should be considered through a transparent, data-driven process to address these changes and identify an IBR solution that best meets the needs for the region. The IBR solution will be submitted to federal agency partners at the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration as part of a re-evaluation required under the National Environmental Policy Act. The re-evaluation will document the extent of new impacts based on the changes recommended to determine the next steps in the federal environmental process.
The following chart provides an overview of the target timeline goals for the general buckets of work that need to be completed to begin construction. Community and stakeholder engagement will continue through construction.
Category | Start Date | End Date |
---|---|---|
Program Launch | Fall 2020 | Winter 2021 |
Planning | Fall 2020 | Winter 2022 |
Environmental | Summer 2021 | Early 2025 |
Design | Winter 2021 | Early 2026 |
Permitting | Summer 2024 | 2026 |
Pre-Construction | Summer 2024 | 2026 |
Community Engagement | Fall 2020 | 2026 |
Disadvantaged Business Participation Goals
Through Dec 2022*
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) are for-profit small business concerns where socially and economically disadvantaged individuals own at least a 51% interest and also control management and daily business operations.
Contractual Obligation | Current Participation |
---|---|
15% | 16% |
Current Funding Sources
* An additional $1 billion is dedicated through the Move Ahead WA transportation package for future work to complete construction.
Oregon: $55,000,000*
Washington: $ 45,000,000**
Funding Source notes:
* – CFDA 20.205, title Highway Planning and Construction, Federal Aid Highway Program Funds. Reflects committed funding through August 2022.
** – WA State Motor Vehicle account funds.
An additional $1 billion is dedicated through the Move Ahead WA transportation package for future work to complete construction.
Current Expenditures
Expenditures Through December 2022*
IBR Program Work | Spent through Dec 2022* |
WSDOT | $ 3,285,942.00 |
ODOT | $ 3,271,970.00 |
General Engineering Consultant** | $ 56,440,547.63 |
Intergovernmental Agreements | $ 3,293,553.00 |
*Spending reflects all costs associated with program work since efforts were reinitiated in July 2019, including labor, equipment, and expenses. Oregon and Washington states have agreed to share costs equally, but the timing of funding and expenditures will vary.
**General Engineering Consultant figure reflects costs incurred for work performed through the date indicated.
GEC Expenditures
Expenditures Through December 2022*
Description |
Expenditures Through Dec 2022 |
Program Management |
9,279,765.87 |
Program Controls |
6,261,169.58 |
Financial Structures |
2,354,687.12 |
Communications |
8,846,077.55 |
Transportation Planning |
4,184,708.27 |
Environmental |
7,151,628.83 |
Transit Planning/Engineering |
4,135,919.62 |
Design Engineering |
7,725,396.42 |
Major Structures |
3,075,175.54 |
Public Affairs/Partner Relations |
727,627.20 |
Direct Expense |
1,802,961.55 |
Program Office |
895,385.08 |
Consultant Representation by Geographic Area
Through December 2022*
PNW firms are firms with offices in OR and WA, that are not in the Portland/Vancouver region.
Portland / Vancouver - 57%
Northwest - 26%
Other - 17%
Previous Accountability Dashboards
Accountability Dashboard V.7 October - December 2022
Accountability Dashboard V.6 July - September 2022
Accountability Dashboard V.5 April - June 2022
Accountability Dashboard V.4 January - March 2022
Accountability Dashboard V.3 September - December 2021
Accountability Dashboard V.2 June - August 2021
Accountability Dashboard V.1 January - May 2021
Number of comments received via email and the website form.